Wednesday, May 18, 2005

sacrifice(s)…no?

i tried obtaining the definition, of the word sacrifice, from the Merriam-Webster Online dictionary (R). the result was somewhat unsatisfactory and i decided to pen it in my own words instead.

sacrifice = act of selflessness (i.e. being the bigger person), the giver. hope this definition is clear.

i have come across many people, articles and what not, talking about sacrifices in life, relationships, principles and so forth. i sacrificed my spare time to take my wife out shopping. she sacrificed her life to save her only son from the burning wreckage. the list just goes on and on. i will focus on the relationship aspect of sacrifice today (surprise surprise). some people comment that they ‘give’ more in a relationship. they love more, they care more, they ’sacrifice’ more. in return, they sometimes take less or nothing at all. this can be painful and burdening to the person, who ’sacrifices’ more.

in my opinion, the word sacrifice is not supposed to be included along with the word, relationship. some of you maybe going “Oh my God! what rubbish”, right about now. well, here is my justification for my statement above. a relationship requires a lot of give and take. a lot of COMPROMISE (not sacrifice). if you give and expect the same measure back, then you are not being realistic. give because you love and give because you want to. not because you want something in return. you will end up hurting less, i can safely say. try changing your mindset from:

I sacrificed my time…. to something more positive like, I made time….you made a compromise, not a sacrifice. you did it for love of the other person. do you see the light bulb glowing brighter now? ;)

i will use a little scenario, to further explain my point. Jack and Jill are in a relationship. one fine day, Jill is offered a scholarship to go abroad and study. Jack and Jill did not want to part, but it was in the best interest for both parties. after all, it was Jill’s dream to study abroad and hopefully secure a better future for herself, her family and the family she might start with Jack. usually we would think that Jack had to sacrifice and let Jill go right? and if we take a look at Jill, she has to leave everything she holds dear and familiar behind. so, she would also be sacrificing right? so in the end, they both sacrificed in the relationship for a greater cause/purpose. *bzzzzzzzzt* wrong…they both made a compromise in this situation. not a sacrifice. :P

i guess this is all my ramblings for now. hope the message has reached across and made you think about the word, sacrifice. till the next issue, hasta luego

Posted by nawooz at 04:24:47
Comments

4 Responses to “sacrifice(s)…no?”

  1. DreamCatcher says:

    So if I did read right, is this compromise about a long distance relationship? And when you say Jack had to "let go" does that mean that Jack allowed Jill to go study abroad, or let Jill go as in end the relationship?

    Relationships will always have sacrifices and compromises. If there is a big difference betwen the two words…something always remains the same…THAT IT ALWAYS HURTS BIG TIME. Its like getting shot and a welt forms on the surface of your skin. But on the bright side it will make Jack a more mature man or paintballer, whichever. Get my drift?

  2. nawooz says:

    haha…nice way of putting it DC…for the reference, it meant Jack let Jill continue with her dreams, but supported her as well in her ‘quest’. i like my stories to have happy endings…yea yea…some people might be going *cough cough* sucker *cough cough*.

    and i have to agree with you completely, Jack is bruised and yes it hurts a whole lot…but Jack has grown and learnt a lot during the way…and he is on the way to being a Superman on the field :D

    thanks for sharing your piece of mind…good to have a nice dialogue sometimes…blogging can be a lonely lonely task :P

  3. bLuE AnGeL says:

    Yes,sometimes blogging is a lonely task.;)I love to blog about how i feel about that special guy, but it had made me
    felt even lonelier. not because that i had realised i had *given more* but received *lesser* but just needed the time
    to adjust to a different tempo. hoping this could suit him more.ha. in the end, i’m still doing the ‘compromising role’… good luck to myself… (:

  4. hey,where are you from??can u email me please,thx

Leave a Reply